Sensenig Law Firm, P.A.

News

Stay updated with the latest legal insights, trends, and firm announcements.

 
 
 
New Episode Alert: Wine by the Case Episode 6 – Two-Buck Chuck

Get ready to pour yourself a glass and dive into the latest episode of Wine by the Case! In Episode 6, we’re tackling a riveting legal battle that pits retail giant Trader Joe’s against a small wine shop in New York City over alleged trademark infringement. This classic David vs. Goliath story offers crucial insights into trademark law and its implications for the wine and retail industries.

Read More
Christine Sensenig
December 2024 Update on the Texas Federal Court’s “Thumbs Down”  of the Corporate Transparency Act Requirements

Texas federal court halts the Corporate Transparency Act's BOI filing requirements, declaring it "likely unconstitutional." Businesses are no longer required to meet the January 2025 deadline, marking a major shift in compliance. Learn how this decision impacts regulatory obligations, what’s next for the CTA, and how the Sensenig Law Firm keeps you informed about evolving legal developments.

Read More
Christine Sensenig
Wine, Donuts, and True Crime: Episode 4 (VIDEO)

Indulgence meets intrigue in this week’s episode of Wine by the Case! In Episode 4: Sexual Chocolate, Layer Cake, and Heavenly Creme Chardonnay, we’re diving into the wild and whimsical world of donuts and the law. From sticky thefts to mysterious glaze-filled crimes, we uncover the most bizarre cases involving everyone’s favorite sweet treat.

Read More
Christine Sensenig
New Case by the U.S. Supreme Court Defining “Adverse Employment Action” for Discrimination, Harassment, & Retaliation Employment Matters

The U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Muldrow v. City of St. Louis redefines "adverse employment action" under Title VII, no longer requiring significant harm for discrimination, harassment, or retaliation claims. Even minor workplace changes can now qualify, potentially leading to more claims proceeding to trial.

Read More
The National Labor Relations Board Issues a Second Memo Yet Again Focused on Non-Competition Agreements

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has issued a new memorandum targeting non-competition agreements, following the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas ruling against the Federal Trade Commission's (FTC) national ban attempt. The NLRB's memo argues that non-compete clauses restrict employees from collective action and workplace advocacy, potentially imposing severe financial penalties. The NLRB seeks to broaden penalties for enforcing overly restrictive non-competes, including lost wages, moving costs, and retraining. While these policies are still in early stages, employers should stay informed as these developments could significantly impact labor practices.

Read More
Christine Sensenig
To paraphrase Queen: 'Another Rule Bites the Dust' as the DOL 80/20 Tip Credit for Restaurant Workers Ends

As of August 23, 2024, restaurants no longer need to track how much time tipped employees spend on non-tipped duties to maintain the tip credit. The previous rule required 80% of a worker's time to be spent on tip-earning tasks, but the Fifth Circuit Court has ruled this standard "arbitrary and capricious," reducing the requirement to 51%.

Restaurateurs should update their time-keeping practices and consider a wage and hour audit to ensure compliance with the new standard.

Read More
Christine Sensenig
Breaking news from Pennsylvania on the pending FTC Non-Compete Ban litigation

On July 23, 2024, the FTC won a significant victory when the Eastern District of Pennsylvania court upheld its ban on non-competition agreements, rejecting ATS Tree Services, LLC's motion to stay enforcement. The court found no substantial likelihood of "irreparable harm" and confirmed the FTC's statutory authority. This contrasts with a recent Northern District of Texas ruling, which temporarily halted the ban in Texas pending a final decision on August 30, 2024. The conflicting rulings set the stage for a major legal showdown that could reshape employment law nationwide.

Read More
Christine Sensenig
A busy month for the Eastern District Court of Texas — and the impact on the rest of us Significant updates on the pending FTC Non-Compete Ban Case and the DOL Salary Increase Case

The Eastern District of Texas, known for its business-friendly rulings, surprised everyone by allowing national regulations on salary thresholds and non-compete agreements to proceed. While the court limited the impact on Texas employers, businesses nationwide should prepare for changes.

Read More
Christine Sensenig
Department of Labor Salary Thresholds and New Lawsuit Filed in Texas to Stop Those Increases 

The Department of Labor (DOL) is once again attempting to raise the minimum salary threshold required to exempt employees from overtime pay under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). After a failed attempt in 2016, the DOL now proposes increasing the threshold from $35,568 to $55,069 per year, with regular adjustments for inflation. This move has sparked a new lawsuit in the Eastern District Court of Texas, the same court that struck down the DOL's previous effort. Critics argue that the current threshold is insufficient for a living wage, particularly in states like Florida, while opponents claim the DOL is overstepping its authority.

Read More
Christine Sensenig
New OSHA Site Inspection Rules

Effective May 29, 2024, OSHA's new "walkaround rule" allows both employers and employees to designate third-party representatives, including union organizers, to accompany inspectors during site inspections. This change raises concerns about potential union recruitment during inspections. Employers can mitigate liability risks by requiring third parties to sign liability waivers and non-disclosure agreements. The rule prohibits representatives from obstructing inspections, with violations leading to potential expulsion. Employers should prepare for these changes to ensure compliance and prevent disputes.

Read More
Christine Sensenig